Spector Argument Coverage

See this piece from the LA Times; this piece from the New York Times; this AP dispatch; and this Reuters dispatch.

Totenberg on Spector

Hear her NPR report this morning here.

Nationwide Medicaid Watch

Yesterday's New York Times contained this article entitled "Governors Prepare to Fight Medicaid Cuts."

Public Transit (In)accessibility in Boston

See this article from the Boston Herald, which begins:

Despite a lawsuit and repeated complaints from disabled passengers, the MBTA is failing to maintain escalators and elevators that continually break down, denying access to thousands of people throughout the subway system, a Herald review found.
During the past week, elevators were found to be out of service at such critical hubs as North Station and Downtown Crossing, while escalators were closed down at stations along nearly every subway line in the city. Some of those facilities have been shut down for weeks, advocates for the disbaled say.
``They are essentially thumbing their nose at the Americans with Disabilities Act,'' said Rob Park, a disabled passenger who says he broke his leg Feb. 11 when a broken elevator at an Orange Line station forced him into the street to get to another station.
``The ADA was filed in 1990. That's 15 years ago,'' Park said. ``Why are we still having these issues?''

Racial Disparities in Special Education

See this article from the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune, which begins:

One out of every five black students in Columbia Public Schools qualified for some type of special education service last year, compared to one in seven white students.

The biggest disparities showed up in the number of diagnoses for mental retardation, emotional disturbances and learning disabilities.

The article goes on to give a useful overview of the general issue.

Nashville Tennessean on IDEA Reauthorization

Interesting timing, but the paper has an article on what parents and teachers are thinking about what the new law will change. Here's a taste:

Changes to the nation's special-education law will require schools to do more to find and educate kids with a disability. It also relaxes some of the rules so educators can spend more time in class and less time on meetings and paperwork.

But some parents are worried that their rights — and the rights of children with disabilities — are quietly being eroded after years of struggle to beef them up.

''It's been an uphill battle her whole life,'' said Brenda Tate, a Cheatham County parent who has found herself at odds with public schools over how to best educate her daughter, Alison, 18, who has Down syndrome. ''It's just been a struggle.''

Parents may have reason to be concerned. The updated version of the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which kicks in July 1, makes it tougher for them to file complaints if they don't like the way their child is being educated, gives kids with disabilities less of a break when it comes to discipline infractions, and relaxes a rule that makes it mandatory for every person involved in their child's education to meet face-to-face at least once a year.

The latest version of the law, which has been revised multiple times since it was created 30 years ago, also is garnering much praise from parents, teachers and school administrators because it reduces the amount of paperwork for teachers, strengthens the push for students with special needs to be included in regular classes whenever possible, and forces schools to step up the search for homeless and foster children who may need services.

Lots of Spector Coverage

See this article from the National Law Journal; this article from the Christian Science Monitor; and this article from the Financial Times.

State Penitentiary Tries to Accommodate Disabled Prisoners

See this interesting AP dispatch from North Dakota. A few excerpts:

When Kim Casey begins serving a six-year manslaughter sentence on Monday, he will be one of four prisoners at the state Penitentiary in wheelchairs.

His lawyer has raised questions about whether the penitentiary is equipped for a disabled inmate. The warden and other wheelchair inmates acknowledge the Bismarck prison is old, but they say prisoners' disabilities have not caused major problems.

* * *

Flanagan, who is serving a three-year term for fraud, said he worries more about abuse from other inmates than about navigating the building.

"The problem in this penitentiary is that a lot of young kids think they're the toughest thing since gangsters and they like to reach out and grab us," he said. "That's the problem going right now that needs to be straightened out."

Inmates who fear for their safety can fill out separation forms or check themselves into protective custody, Schuetzle said.

"That's always a concern," Schuetzle said. "You're putting in very vulnerable people with the most aggressive predatory type guys in the whole state.

Big Verdict Against Wal-Mart in Disability Discrimination Suit

See this piece from the New York Daily News, which begins:

A Centereach who sued Wal-Mart for disability discrimination was awarded $7.5 million Tuesday night, after a week-long trial.

"I felt very good," said Patrick Brady, 21, who suffers from cerebral palsy. "I felt it was very fair."

Brady had worked for two years at another Centereach pharmacy, The Village Chemist, before getting a job as a pharmacy assistant at the Centereach Mall Wal-Mart in 2002.

Brady's attorney, Douglas Wigdor, said department manager Yem Hung Chin asked Brady if he could do his job despite his disability.

"After one day, the defendant decided that Patrick - just because he's disabled - was unable to hand out prescription medication," Wigdor said. Brady worked in the Wal-Mart pharmacy for three days. Chin transferred him to the parking lot, where he was told to collect shopping carts and pick up garbage.

"I felt like she thought I was worthless," Brady said. "It was degrading that she thought I couldn't do the job when I had done it for two years."

The New York Post weighs in here; Newsday here; and the Grey Lady, deciding that this obviously isn't important enough to assign one of its own reporters to it, runs this AP dispatch.

British DDA Update

See this dispatch, which begins:

The Disability Discrimination Bill is awaiting its third reading in the House of Lords, on the 28th February, following major gains for the DRC and the Disability Lobby at report stage.

The Bill fulfils a key Government manifesto commitment to create comprehensive rights for disabled people. It will give new rights of access to public transport and private clubs, give disabled tenants rights to reasonable adjustments from their landlords and extend the definition of disability to cover more mental health service users and people with HIV, cancer and MS.

Disabled councillors will have protection against discrimination for the first time. And the centrepiece of the Bill is a new disability equality duty for the public sector, which will help break down institutional discrimination across public services.

Disability organisations have successfully pursued amendments on housing adaptations, action against harassment and bullying and better scrutiny of exemptions from the rail vehicle accessibility regulations.

All three equality commissions have welcomed a landmark Court of Appeal decision strengthening the Burden of Proof regulations. The judgement has made it clear that if an individual has established that there could be a valid case of discrimination, employers are expected to provide detailed evidence to prove that they did not discriminate. Evidence needs to show that an employer's actions were in no way related to an employee's sex, race, disability, sexual orientation or religion/belief in order to defeat these claims.

Legal Times on "Death With Dignity" Grant

See this article.

News on IDEA Burden-of-Proof Cert. Grant

See this article from the Washington Post.

News on Cert. Grant in "Death With Dignity" Case

See this Linda Greenhouse piece in the New York Times; this Charles Lane piece in the Washington Post; and this David Savage piece in the Los Angeles Times.

Bush Budget Proposes Cut in Housing Aid for Disabled

See this article by that title in the New York Times. The lede:

With little fanfare, the Bush administration is proposing to stop financing the construction of new housing for the mentally ill and physically handicapped as part of a 50 percent cut in its housing budget for people with disabilities.

Supreme Court Grants Cert. in Oregon Death with Dignity Case

The Supreme Court granted cert. today in Gonzales v. Oregon, No. 04-623, which poses the question whether the distribution of medication for purposes of assisted suicide pursuant to Oregon's "Death with Dignity" Act violates the federal Controlled Substances Act.

Supreme Court Grants Cert. in IDEA Case

The case, Schaffer v. Weast, No. 04-698, raises the question of who -- the school district or the student -- bears the burden of proof on the adequacy of a student's IEP. I've never understood why this is such a significant issue, but it has divided the circuits.

Inclusive Education in Indonesia

See this article from the Jakarta Post, which begins:

The Ministry of National Education is pushing that disabled children be permitted to join public schools as part of its efforts to include them in the nine-year mandatory education program.

"This program is focused on elementary and junior high schools because they are the level that the government focuses on in the mandatory education program," Joko Sutopo, who heads the student affairs sub-directorate at the Ministry of National Education.

He said the schools must not discriminate. "Children with mental and physical disabilities are not second-class citizens. It's in line with our nation's soul, Bhineka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity)."

The ministry has developed the inclusive education program for disabled children since 2003, aimed at ensuring their right to basic education.

"Special Schools (SLB) cannot fulfill the demands of children with mental disabilities as they only serve those with physical disabilities," Joko said.

Under the inclusive program, children with disabilities such as autism and Down's syndrome are enrolled in regular schools, in which teachers have received trained on how to deal with them.

Disability Rights in India

See this article from the Times of India. Some excerpts:

And, Justice Shah set the ball rolling for a brain storming discussion when he too stressed the need to amend the said Act. "The definition of disability as given in 1995 Act needs to be widen to protect the rights of people suffering from HIV, leprosy and internal organ failure," he said.

Currently the Act gives protection to those suffering from, blindness, low vision, leprosy cured, hearing impaired, mental retardation, mental illness and locomotor disability.

Justice Shah pointed out that there are 600 million people in the world, nearly ten percent of the world's population, who suffer from one disability or the other. Of these, 90 million are from India. However, even then, the total percentage of the disabled people in India is just six per cent of its population while in the developed nation like USA the disabled population's percentage is nine per cent.

" This is not because there are more disabled persons in USA but because the definition of disability is more wider in USA," Justice Shah said.

Besides limited scope, there are some other lacunas in the act too, Justice Shah observed adding "There are no guidelines and no deadlines set for non adherence,".

Elaborating, Justice Shah pointed out that most government and semi-government organisations do not strictly follow the guidelines to reserve three per cent jobs for disabled and yet they go unpunished.

Also, as per the Act the compensation is to be awarded to a disabled as per the financial capacity of the employer. The employers often take advantage of this clause. Also, a provision to award some temporary relieves, till the case is decided, to the affected (disabled) employee needs to be incorporated.

Des Moines Register on Social Security Privatization and People with Disabilities

See this article, and this editorial, today.

Nationwide Medicaid Watch

See this AP dispatch from yesterday, entitled "Governors Oppose Bush's Medicaid Cuts."

Molski Watch

See this article from the Los Angeles Business Journal on Molski; and this op-ed by a member of the California Assembly on legislation he is proposing to limit the ability to sue to challenge "technical" violations of disability law.

State Medicaid Watch: Maryland

See this article in the Annapolis Capital, entitled "Families Fight Cut in Disability Program"

HIV Found to be No Disability

See this article by that title in the Gay City News. The lede:

A federal district judge dismissed a workplace discrimination claim brought by an HIV-positive man on the ground that the man’s HIV infection did not meet the statutory definition for disability because he had no interest in having children. This is the latest of several recent rulings suggesting that the federal American With Disabilities Act (ADA) is unlikely to provide much protection against workplace bias to HIV-positive gay men who are staying healthy through medical treatment.

Lund on Civil Rights in the Rehnquist Court

New on Westlaw: Nelson Lund, The Rehnquist Court's Pragmatic Approach to Civil Rights, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 249 (2004). The article contains an interesting discussion of, among other things, several of the Court's important ADA decisions.

Sixth Circuit Decides Dillery Case

See this opinion, issued yesterday. Dillery, the plaintiff, uses a motorized wheelchair and was cited by police officers in Sandusky, Ohio, for riding the wheelchair in the street. She sued the city under ADA Title II; she contended that the city had failed to install curb cuts on its sidewalks as the statute required. The lower court issued an injunction ordering the city to comply with Title II's curb cut requirements, but that injunction was identical to another injunction, in a separate case brought against Sandusky by other plaintiffs, that was issued before the order in the Dillery case (though the separate case was filed after Dillery's case). The Dillery court on appeal held that Dillery was not entitled to attorney's fees, because the relief she received was essentially moot given the existence of the other injunction. Judge Merritt dissented on this point.

Employment Effects of the UK's Disability Discrimination Act

New on SSRN: David N.F. Bell & Axel Heitmueller, The Disability Discrimination Act in the UK: Helping or Hindering Employment Amongst the Disabled?. The abstract:

The enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990 triggered a substantial academic debate about its consequences on employment rates of disabled people. In contrast, the employment provision of the 1996 Disability
Discrimination Act (DDA) in Britain has received little attention. This paper provides robust evidence that, similar to the ADA in the US, the DDA has had no impact on the employment rate of disabled people or possibly worsened it. Possible reasons for this are low take-up of financial support, low levels of general awareness about the Act among disabled people and employers, and limited knowledge about the true costs of required adjustments.

The Effects of Disability on Labor Force Status in Australia

New on SSRN: Roger Wilkins, The Effects of Disability on Labour Force Status in Australia, 37 Australian Econ. Rev. 359 (2004). The abstract:

Using the Australian Bureau of Statistics 1998 Survey of
Disability, Ageing and Carers, this study examines the effects
of disability on four labour market outcomes: not in the labour
force, unemployed, part-time employed and full-time employed.
The detailed information on health available in the dataset also
facilitates investigation of the dependence of effects on the
characteristics of the disability, including severity,
impairment type and age of onset. Disability is found to have
substantial effects on labour force status, on average acting to
decrease the probability of labour force participation by
one-quarter for males and one-fifth for females. For males, the
decrease in fulltime employment accounts for almost all of the
decrease in labour force participation associated with
disability; for females, disability has negative effects on both
full-time and part-time employment. Analysis of disability
characteristics shows that adverse effects on labour force
status are increasing in the severity of the disability and are
also worse for those with more than one type of impairment and
for those who experience disability onset at older ages. There
is evidence that the adverse effects of disability are lower for
males who completed their education after the onset of the
disability.

Brief Blog Hiatus

Because I'll be travelling through Friday, it's unlikely I'll post anything new until the weekend.

New Article on Testing Accommodations

New on Westlaw: John D. Ranseen et al., Test Accommodations for Postsecondary Students: The Quandary Resulting From the ADA's Disability Definition, 11 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 83 (2005). The abstract:

Legal wrangling precipitated by the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) has resulted in courts adopting a narrow view of disability. This narrow categorical disability definition is in conflict with current mental health and educational practice that presumes an inclusive view of disability. Test accommodations for licensing exams based on learning impairments provide an example of the conflict generated by legal versus mental health views of disability. Mental health practitioners often support test accommodation requests for students who do not meet the ADA's strict threshold for disability determination. Mental health practitioners must understand the ADA definition of disability, and test organizations need to examine goals and alter standard practice in a manner that is fair and equitable independent of learning impairments.

More on Harkin on Disability and Social Security Privatization

See this article.

State Medicaid Watch: Missouri

See this AP dispatch, which begins:

Diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and a rare form of muscular dystrophy, Bobbette Figler relies on Medicaid to help pay for costly prescriptions and medical treatment. She also depends on state-supported personal assistants that help her with everyday chores, allowing the St. Louis resident to live independently and work part time.

But Figler said Wednesday her days of independence may be over if Medicaid cuts proposed by Gov. Matt Blunt are approved. She said she would lose her Medicaid funding and access to in-home help, leaving her with no choice but to quit her job and enter a nursing home to receive the care she needs.

"I realized my dream (of working) four years ago, and taking that away would be a total waste," she said.

Figler joined dozens of disabled Medicaid recipients and disability rights advocates Wednesday in the Missouri Capitol Rotunda to rally against the governor's proposed cuts.

Blunt's budget would lower the income eligibility criteria for disabled Medicaid recipients to about $580 per month from the current $775. It also would eliminate a program that allows many disabled Missourians to continue their Medicaid coverage while working part time. Medicaid coverage would no longer be available for medical equipment, such as wheelchairs and prosthetics.

Settlement in Connecticut Community Services Case

See this article in Newsday. Some excerpts:

After a 15-year lobbying effort and a federal lawsuit, an advocacy group for the mentally retarded appeared on the verge of getting the legislature to substantially reduce a list of hundreds of people waiting for housing and services.

The legislature's Public Health Committee on Wednesday unanimously approved a bill that that would ratify a legal settlement reached last summer between Arc/Connecticut and the state departments of Mental Retardation and Social Services.

* * *

Under the settlement, relief will be provided to at least 1,250 families over five years who are determined by DMR to be most in need. At least 150 individuals each year will be able to move out of their families' homes and an additional 100 families per year will receive some form of assistance, such as in-home help.

Arc/Connecticut estimates that there are nearly 2,000 people on the DMR waiting list. Last September, DMR said there were 1,064 individuals.

Legal Times on Accommodations for Deaf Patients in Emergency Rooms

See this article about a recent lawsuit in Prince George's County, Maryland. The article has good info on the issue generally. Thanks to John Gear for the pointer.

Harkin Wants to Know

According to this article in the Des Moines Register, Sen. Tom Harkin is sending a letter to the President asking him to make clear how the disability program will be treated under the President's privatization plan.

Tennessee v. Lane Hits Israel?

See this article in Haaretz, which begins:

The courthouse in Hadera is a three-story building with zero elevators. Its courtrooms are on the second floor. So if you're in a wheelchair, be you a lawyer or the defendant, or a mere witness, you can't attend the hearing. That's how it goes.

Judge Mohamad Massarwi found a simple solution to the problem. He ordered attorney Victor Mizrahi, who was disabled during his army service, to empower another lawyer to appear in his stead.

Wheelchair-bound Mizrahi was to appear in Hadera Magistrates Court, and asked to move the venue of the hearing to the ground floor. But Judge Massarwi refused, pointing out that the ground floor had no courtrooms nor facilities for typing the minutes of the hearings. He therefore ordered Mizrahi to empower another lawyer to represent the defendant.

Proposed Minnesotans with Disabilities Act of 2005

See this article in the St. Paul Pioneer Press, which begins:

A coalition of disability activists, flanked by a bipartisan group of legislators, on Monday announced an ambitious plan to move thousands of working-age, disabled Minnesotans out of nursing homes and into more independent living settings.

The relocation plan is a major component of the large-scale Minnesotans with Disabilities Act of 2005, which would address some of the health care, housing, transportation and employment needs of disabled Minnesotans. The Minnesota Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities, a coalition of more than 40 organizations that provides and advocates for people with disabilities, developed the legislation being sponsored by Sen. Becky Lourey, DFLKerrick, and Rep. Tim Wilkin, R-Eagan.

And see these details from an article in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune:

The bill's scope is expansive, including these proposals:

• Lower medical service fees paid by parents of severely disabled children.

• Increase eligibility for Medical Assistance to 100 percent of the federal poverty guideline, which would allow individual income of $775 per month instead of the current $582.

• Raise the assets limit for those eligible for Medical Assistance to $10,000 for singles, up from $3,000.

• Allow those in adult foster care $150 a month for personal needs, up from $75.

• Eliminate the $500 annual cap on dental services for patients in Medical Assistance, General Assistance Medical Care and MinnesotaCare.

• Increase wages for direct care workers by approving rate increases for home- and community-based service providers.

• Increase by 5 percent a year the funding for Metro Mobility and expand transit service for the disabled in outstate Minnesota.

• Offer a $2,500 one-time grant to help pay transition costs for non-elderly disabled Minnesotans attempting to move out of nursing homes.

Funny, I know someone who was just calling proposals like this "the future of disability law."

Airlines Wary Over Disability Law

See this report from the BBC, which begins:

New EU legislation which will put the onus on airports to help disabled passengers could lead to increased costs, airlines say.

The proposals, to be set out on Wednesday, are the first European laws on disability rights.

Assistance for disabled passengers will be provided by airports centrally rather than by individual airlines.

But the Association of European Airlines (AEA) said this will put 30p on the price of every ticket.

Interesting Boston Globe Piece on SSDI

Though the privatization proposals are the occasion for this article, the piece has a good general discussion of issues and problems in the Social Security disability program.

Columbia U. Program on Disability and the Law

I just received this announcement:

The Columbia University Seminar on Disability Studies

DISABILITY AND THE LAW

Wednesday March 2, 2005

4:00 – 6:00 pm

Faculty House 400 West 117th Street

Dinner to follow. See below for details and directions.

Why is there a rollback against disability rights legislation in the United States? What new legislation is being proposed to counteract adverse decisions by the U. S. Supreme Court? How can we help ensure that the rights of people with disabilities will be protected in a too-often hostile environment? What is happening in other nations that impact on people with disabilities? These and other related questions will be addressed by three speakers actively dealing with these issues.

The Globalization of Disability Rights Law

Arlene Kanter, Professor of Law and Co-Director, Center on Disability Studies, Law and Human Policy, Director of Clinical Legal Education, Syracuse University College of Law

US Disability Law

John Gresham, Senior Litigation Counsel, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest

Respondent: Sagit Mor, JSD (Doctoral Program) candidate at NYU School of Law. Formerly an attorney for Bizchut (By Right), an Israeli disability rights organization.

Moderators: Doris Zames Fleischer and Frieda Zames, both affiliated with New Jersey Institute of Technology and co-authors of "The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation."

Lecture is free and open to the public. ASL interpreters will be present.

For information, you can contact heeralparekh@yahoo.com.

NCD Background Paper on Spector

The National Council on Disability has issued this background paper on Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Lines, which will be argued in the Supreme Court in a couple of weeks,

GAO on Autism and Special Education

The Government Accountability Office issued this report (really a series of powerpoint slides) today on autism and special education. The key points:

The number of children diagnosed with autism served under IDEA has increased by more than 500 percent in the last decade. In 2002, data collected for the Department of Education indicated that nearly 120,000 children diagnosed with autism were being served under IDEA. This substantial increase may be due to a number of factors, including better diagnoses and a broader definition of autism.

The services provided to children with autism depend on the needs of the child. These services may include speech therapy, occupational therapy, and the services of special education teachers. As with other children with disabilities, children with autism are eligible for special education services under IDEA in accordance with their individualized education programs (programs established by a team familiar with the needs of the child).

The average per pupil expenditure for educating a child with autism was estimated by SEEP to be over $18,000 in the 1999-2000 school year, the most recent year for which data were available. This estimate was nearly three times the expenditure for a typical regular education student who did not receive special education services and was among the highest per pupil expenditures for school-age children receiving special education services in public schools.

Post-Dispatch on People with Disabilities and Social Security Privatization

My hometown paper had a great article on the effects of social security privatization on people with disabilities yesterday.

Good Sixth Circuit "Regarded As" Opinion

In its opinion issued yesterday in Moorer v. Baptist Memorial Health Care System, the Sixth Circuit affirmed a judgment of ADA liability against an employer who terminated the plaintiff allegedly because it perceived him to be an alcoholic. The lower court concluded that the plaintiff was "regarded as" having a disability because the employer perceived his condition as substantially limiting the major life activity of working. The Sixth Circuit, affirming on this point, offered a helpful discussion of how a court should go about deciding whether an employer (who presumably isn't thinking about anything but his or her own workplace) perceived an employee as having a condition that restricted the ability to perform a "broad class of jobs."

Community Placements in Tennessee

See this article in the Tennessean.

State Disabilities Program May Be Expanded

See this article by that title in the Macon Telegraph, about the possible expansion of home and community placements for people with mental retardation in Georgia.

California Supreme Court Implements Atkins

See this LA Times article, which begins:

The California Supreme Court cleared the way Thursday for dozens of condemned prisoners to escape their death sentences on the grounds they are mentally retarded, defining the disability more flexibly than prosecutors had wanted.

Prosecutors, who fear a flood of petitions from death-row inmates, wanted the court to define retardation using a specific IQ level. They suggested 70 on a scale on which the average is 100. The court declined.

"IQ tests are insufficiently precise to utilize a fixed cutoff in this context," Justice Janice Rogers Brown wrote for the court.

Instead, the justices said, inmates could get hearings to challenge their death sentences as long as a qualified expert says they are retarded.

The California Supreme Court's opinion can be found here.

Casey Martin Update

His pro golf career seems to be winding down. See this article.

Comparative Disability Law

New on SSRN: my piece, Comparative Disability Employment Law from an American Perspective, 24 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 649 (2003) (published 2004). The abstract:

American disability employment law underwent a series of profound transformations during the twentieth century. A scheme of social welfare at the century's beginning, by the century's end disability law had shifted significantly toward a civil rights orientation. Similar transformations - frequently inspired by the example of the ADA, but at the same time deriving from indigenous movements of people with disabilities - have occurred throughout the world. None of these transformations has been identical to the transformation in American disability employment policy. Notwithstanding the differences, however, the overall trend is clear: across the industrialized world, disability policy is increasingly being reoriented from caretaking to work-promoting, from segregationist to integrationist, and from welfare to civil rights. Yet American scholars have made no sustained effort to assess what lessons other countries' experiences may hold for disability policy in the United States. This brief essay, which responds to papers submitted for a symposium on comparative disability law, seeks to highlight some of the dimensions along which a comparative approach would shed light on important issues in the design and interpretation of American disability law. In particular, the essay focuses on two key areas of inquiry. First, what policy tools best advance the increasingly important goals of integration and empowerment for people with disabilities? Second, what is the conception of "disability" that should underlie a disability employment law regime, and how can that conception advance or undermine integrationist goals?

I previously posted on the symposium issue in which this piece was published here.

Parents Oppose Missouri Early Intervention Cuts

See this report.

Molski Update

See this article. Molski's counsel appears to have hired his own counsel, famed (some would say notorious) Los Angeles civil rights lawyer Steve Yagman. That'll certainly make things interesting. For a taste of what I mean, see this excerpt from the article:

''Rafeedie's mean-spiritedness, cruelty and contempt for civil rights makes Hitler look like a humanitarian,'' Yagman said. ''This judge is trying to bar the door to the federal courthouse.''

State Medicaid Watch: Kentucky

See this article, which begins:

Kentucky will drop a proposal to shift Medicaid money from nursing homes and institutions to serve more people at home or in the community, the state's top health official said yesterday.

Instead, Kentucky will ask the federal government for more flexibility in offering an array of mental-health and mental-retardation services through Medicaid, said Health and Family Services Secretary James Holsinger.

Speaking after a rally that drew about 600 Medicaid users to the Capitol, Holsinger said the latest plan would give the state more freedom to offer less costly services by moving people into the community or their homes if they choose.

Criticism of Irish Disability Discrimination Bill

See this article, which begins:

The Taoiseach, Bertie Ahern, has accepted that the controversial Disability Bill is not enough to meet the wishes of groups working with the disabled.

These groups have been highly critical of the new legislation, particularly its failure to include enforceable rights for people with disabilities.

Comparative disability law is a major interest of mine, but I especially love the word "Taoiseach."